It's an election year, which means that I'm once again faced with the dilemma that democracy presents. My friends, I am deeply conflicted about more than a few of the issues forming my ballot, and if you have got the time to read, I'd like to explain.
I fervently believe in the right of the American people to voice their collective opinions via the democratic electoral system. I believe that it's good and right that individuals choose how and by whom they will be governed. Frankly, I also believe that there exists reasonable biblical precedent to defend that statement. I respect and honor the tradition of American justice that protects my right to vote, and as such I take my responsibility to participate in democracy very, very seriously. I vote, and I work to be informed so that I cannot abdicate my right through the lame excuse of ignorance.
Perhaps it's because I am so firm in my stance upon voting that I am particularly conflicted about the implications of my vote. The big two are California's Prop 8, and the presidential election.
Prop 8 - I have to say that I'm relieved that this isn't a cut and dry "If you're a Christian, you vote yes" issue for many of my friends. Certainly it is black and white for some people, but I think we've crossed a threshold of sorts in this current generation. It seems to me that we've begun to understand that morality simply can't be enforced by laws. These United States uphold constitutional measures that reflect the values of the people, not define them. The changes I want to see in society will never be made through legislature... they'll always be made on an individual basis. So, for me, this is not a matter of legitimizing homosexuality, it's a matter of reflecting how Californians view the rights of all mankind. I've enjoyed the statement "If you don't like gay marriage, don't get one," and I've appreciated the perspective of many of my more conservative friends that marriage is a sacred institution. In this sense, I think the proposition has been clarified for me. Sacraments are strictly spiritual, proprietorially speaking. The State has no business defining an institution as sacred, or not. It can only go so far as to make a legal standing available without discerning eligibility. It is the business of the church to determine the boundaries of such a sacrament (and I question the modern American church's ability to do so). My concern here is that defying such a proposition as 8 will effectively provide an umbrella to lionize those private institutions that limit the eligibility of a particular sacrament. So the question becomes one of foresight rather than strict ethics. Do you share in this dilemma?
And now for the presidential candidates - what a crap shoot. It's like asking, "Would you prefer to have your left eye put out, or your right? Would you rather scoop out your spleen with a spork or a tuning fork? Would you more enjoy sitting on molten lava or the surface of the sun?" Do you see my point? Damned if you do, indeed. Barack Obama and John McCain are equal evils, they simply differ in variety. Both of the candidates promise a future of 4 years of corruption and war, unrestrained greed for power and lust for money, defiling of the American image on a global stage, haphazard care for the disadvantaged on domestic soil all at the cost of taxpaying, idealistic American citizens. Have we not hoped for men and women of character to run this country? Have we not desired that the collective interests might speak louder than fiscally-endowed special interests? Have we not longed for the betterment of our society? Have not all of our presidents and their posses failed to deliver a suitable answer to our pressing questions? We are at preemptive war, still. Our reputation as a just super-power is tainted by imperialism and our children are just as hungry as they've ever been. The right-wingers swear it's the consequence of morally-depraved, back-slidden whore-mongering Democrats and the left-wingers confidently assert that our bumbling, backwoods President has lead us astray. I say that you're both mistaken - the failure of democracy to provide for the needs of America lies solely within the failure of every politician's character. The moment your own interests and advancement displace the needs of "Joe the Plumber" you have forsaken your right to govern.
So then, for whom do I vote? Has jaded realism really overcome the promise of democracy's ideology? I suppose I should come up with an answer before November 4. In the meantime friends in California, please visit this website for a synopsis of the issues at hand:
Other visitors, be well and feel free to feed back!